<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marimea banerelor si rata de click</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sem-point.com/marimea-banerelor-si-rata-de-click/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sem-point.com/marimea-banerelor-si-rata-de-click/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:19:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Krumel</title>
		<link>http://sem-point.com/marimea-banerelor-si-rata-de-click/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Krumel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sem-point.com/?p=77#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Asta e bine. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asta e bine. <img src='http://sem-point.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://sem-point.com/marimea-banerelor-si-rata-de-click/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sem-point.com/?p=77#comment-15</guid>
		<description>eu am cele mai bune CTR-uri, cam peste 5 cu un eCPM ce variaza intre 2 si 10 in fucntie de nisa, in felul urmator:

folosesc o singura zona de adsense, 336 x 280 , blended si pusa deasupra postului. Din toate testele de pana acum asta e cea mai buna solutie. 

E adevarat ca daca pui mai multke reclame pe site iti va scadea eCPM-ul , insa overall 2 bannere teoretic vor aduce castiguri mai mari decat 1... Depinde insa de la caz la caz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eu am cele mai bune CTR-uri, cam peste 5 cu un eCPM ce variaza intre 2 si 10 in fucntie de nisa, in felul urmator:</p>
<p>folosesc o singura zona de adsense, 336 x 280 , blended si pusa deasupra postului. Din toate testele de pana acum asta e cea mai buna solutie. </p>
<p>E adevarat ca daca pui mai multke reclame pe site iti va scadea eCPM-ul , insa overall 2 bannere teoretic vor aduce castiguri mai mari decat 1&#8230; Depinde insa de la caz la caz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krumel</title>
		<link>http://sem-point.com/marimea-banerelor-si-rata-de-click/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Krumel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 06:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sem-point.com/?p=77#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Stiu ca merge, dar depinde de site si de nisa.
Poti pune codul de la Adsense sa fie inaine de  dar ca afisare oriunde vrei. Click-uile sint mai bine platite.

Astea sint tot felul de smecherii din Adsense. :)

Unele merg, altele nu ...depinde de site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stiu ca merge, dar depinde de site si de nisa.<br />
Poti pune codul de la Adsense sa fie inaine de  dar ca afisare oriunde vrei. Click-uile sint mai bine platite.</p>
<p>Astea sint tot felul de smecherii din Adsense. <img src='http://sem-point.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Unele merg, altele nu &#8230;depinde de site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Un roman in Canada</title>
		<link>http://sem-point.com/marimea-banerelor-si-rata-de-click/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Un roman in Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 05:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sem-point.com/?p=77#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Interesant studiul intr-adevar! Nu m-am gandit pana acum la pozitionare desi era cam la mintea cucosului...
Apropos de g ads, eu le am pozitionate in partea de header si sub articol si crede-ma ca pozitionarea asta merge brici.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesant studiul intr-adevar! Nu m-am gandit pana acum la pozitionare desi era cam la mintea cucosului&#8230;<br />
Apropos de g ads, eu le am pozitionate in partea de header si sub articol si crede-ma ca pozitionarea asta merge brici.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Despre SEM in Romania &#124; J. Mihai</title>
		<link>http://sem-point.com/marimea-banerelor-si-rata-de-click/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Despre SEM in Romania &#124; J. Mihai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sem-point.com/?p=77#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] - Marimea banerelor si rata de click [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Marimea banerelor si rata de click [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 364/368 objects using disk: basic

Served from: sem-point.com @ 2012-02-05 01:13:52 -->
